Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13593 (JHR)

BAHADUR SAO v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7440/2025 · 2026-02-12

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3899 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7440 of 2025 ---- 1.Bahadur Sao aged about 50 years son of Babulal Sao resident of Village and PO Lokai PS and Dist. Koderma 2.Bhagwan Das @ Bhagwan Das Sahu, aged about 70 years son of Late Koshi Sao, resident of Village and PO Lokai PS and District Koderma 3.Mitlal Yadav @ Manikant Yadav, aged about 57 years son of Bishun Yadav, resident of Village Banshgharwa and PO Indarwa and PS and District Koderma 4.Sahdeo Yadav aged about 53 years son of Gajo Yadav, resident of Village Jalwabad, PO Jalwabad PS and Dist.Koderma 5.Santosh Yadav, aged about 53 years son of Ganesh Yadav, resident of Village Inderwa, PO Lokai, PS Telaiya, District Koderma 6.Shyam Sunder Yadav @ Shyam Yadav, aged about 50 years son of Lalkishun Choudhary resident of Village Inderwa, PO Lokai, PS Telaiya, Dist.Koderma .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate ---- 2/12.02.2026 This matter relates to Complaint Case No.2203 of 2023 and the case is pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma. 2. After some argument, learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw instant petition with liberty to move before learned court on strength of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. 3. Learned counsel for respondent State has got no objection for same. 4. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 12.02.2026 SI/