Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1359 (GAU)

SRI AMAR DHAR @ DURLAV DHAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./655/2026 · 2026-03-18

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010043642026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./655/2026 SRI AMAR DHAR @ DURLAV DHAR S/O- LALI PRADIP DHAR. R/O- VILL.- KHARUPETIA (RAMNAGAR), WARD NO. 08, P.S.- KHARUPETIA, DIST.- DARRANG, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. P AGARWAL, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 19.03.2026 Heard Dr. P Agarwal the learned Legal Aid Counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Bhaskar Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. 2. This application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, in respect of Page No.# 2/2 Sessions Case No. 23(DM)/2023 pending in the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Darrang, Mangaldoi. 3. Out of 13 (thirteen) witnesses, 10 (ten) witnesses, including the victim woman, have already been examined by the Trial Court. Only three witnesses remain to be examined. 4. This Court is of the opinion that at this stage, if the petitioner is allowed to go on bail, it may hamper early disposal of the case before the Trial Court. 5. For this reason only, the bail application is rejected and stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant