Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010219162025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/2774/2026 SRI THAGESWAR DEKA S/O LATE KABIRAM DEKA R/O HOUSE NO 32 KHARGHULI BANKONWAR NAGAR NEAR RAJ BHAWAN KALYANI NAGAR P.O. KHARGHULI P.S. LATASIL DIST. KAMRUP M GUWAHATI 781004 ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 11 ORS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN BANK BHAWAN MADAM CAMA ROAD MUMBAI 400021 2:THE REGIONAL MANAGER NORTH EAST REGION STATE BANK OF INDIA DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 3:THE ASSTT GENERAL MANAGER CCC STATE BANK OF INDIA LOCAL HEAD OFFICE DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 Page No.# 2/4 4:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA GUWAHATI BRANCH PANBAZAR 781001 ASSAM. 5:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA GUWAHATI BRANCH PANBAZAR 781001 ASSAM. 6:THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL AFFAIRS DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 7:THE DIRECOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI 781007 8:THE SUPERINENDENT OF POLICE KAMRUP M GUWAHATI 781031 9:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE LATASIL POLICE STATION DIST. KAMRUP M GUWAHATI 781001 ASSAM. 10:THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR STATION ROAD GUWAHATI 781001 ASSAM. 11:INDUSIN BANK HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT BHANGAGARH G.S. ROAD NEAR PF OFFICE ABOVE BATA SHOWROOM GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN 781005 Page No.# 3/4 12:THE REGIONAL MANAGER INDUSIND BANK BHANGAGARH G.S. ROAD NEAR PF OFFICE ABOVE BATA SHOWROOM GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN 781005 ------------ Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. R Singha Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. J Baruah Standing Counsel, SBI Mr. P Hazarika For respondent No.10 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 02.09.2026 Heard Mr. R Singha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. 2. This is an application filed for impleading the opposite party Nos.11 and 12 as respondent Nos.11 and 12 in the accompanying writ petition being WP(C)No.5712/2025. 3. Taking into account the order passed by this Court on 23.07.2026, it is the opinion of this Court that the opposite party Nos.11 and 12 are necessary Page No.# 4/4 parties to the dispute raised in the accompanying writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the opposite parties Nos.11 and 12 are arrayed as respondent Nos.11 and 12 to the accompanying writ petition. 5. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is directed to file a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court and the Registry on the basis of the said fresh memo of parties as well as the instant order shall make the necessary corrections in the cause-title of the accompanying writ petition and update the same in the CIS. 6. Interlocutory application accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant