GANESH KUMAR YOGI, S/O SHRI SHIV SHANKAR YOGI v. SHRI BHASKAR A. SAWANT
CCP/1042/2026 · 2026-08-20
Ganesh Ram Meena
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13588 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13588 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:33662] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1042/2026 CNR: RJHC020581702026 | URN: CCP / 1092U / 2026 Ganesh Kumar Yogi, S/o Shri Shiv Shankar Yogi, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Chand Kala, Indergarh, Lakehri, Bundi, Rajasthan (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Jaipur.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Shri Bhaskar A. Sawant, IAS, Additional Chief Secretary (Home), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Shri Rajiv Kumar Sharma, IPS, Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Headquarters, Jaipur.
3. Shri Sachin Mittal, IPS, Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur.
4. Shri Rajarshi Raj, IPS, DCP (South), Jaipur Commissionerate, Jaipur.
5. Shri Guru Bhupinder Singh, Police Inspector, SHO, Police Station Muhana, Jaipur.
6. Sakshi Chaudhary, R.J.S., Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, S.N.-18, Sanganer, Jaipur Metro-I, Jaipur.
7. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Sunder Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 20/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non- compliance of the order dated 05.07.2022 passed in S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 245/2022.
[2026:RJ-JP:33662] (2 of 2) [CCP-1042/2026]
2. Vide order dated 05.07.2022, the Court has directed the Principal Secretary, Home and the Director General of Police to file their personal affidavits regarding steps taken in pursuance of the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly admits that the affidavits, as directed by the Court vide order dated 05.07.2022 have been filed by the concerned officers. However, he submits that the CCTV footage as requested by the petitioner from SHO of Police Station Muhana has not been preserved.
3. On consideration submissions made by counsel the petitioner and the directions given by the Court, the Court finds that the issue which is being raised by the petitioner is beyond the scope of the order dated 05.07.2022 of which the petitioner is alleging non- compliance. Petitioner has also not been the party to the
order dated 05.07.2022.
4. In view of the above, the Court finds no merit in this contempt petition hence, the same, is hereby dismissed.
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J 117/Ekta Saini