Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13588 (KAR)

M/S PRADHYUNS GROUP v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER

WP/1083/2022 · 2026-04-23

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22438 WP No. 1083 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 1083 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M/S PRADHYUN’S GROUP HAVING OFFICE AT NO. 3416, 1ST FLOOR, 13TH MAIN 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU -560 010 MR. PUNITH GOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY N.D., ADVOCATE) AND: THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER BANK OF BARODA SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE- 560 099 …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05.01.2022 PASSED IN CRL.MIS.NO.2425 OF 2020 BY THE HON’BLE 24TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BANGALORE UNDER PROVISION OF THE SECURITIZATION ACT AS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-H AND FURTHER RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENT BANK FROM PROCEEDING UNDER THE SARFAESI ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22438 WP No. 1083 of 2022 ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed in the year 2022. Conditional interim order was granted on 31.01.2022 . Thereafter the matter came up on 22.04.2026. So far process is not paid for issuance of notice to the respondents and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 22.04.2026. Hence, this matter is directed to be listed under the caption for “dismissal” on 23.04.2026. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner is enjoying the interim order from 2022 without even paying the process fee for issuance of notice to respondents. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58