Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13588 (ALL)

NARENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/30171/2026 · 2026-10-04

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30171 of 2026 Along with : 1. Writ - C No. 30330 of 2026: Smt Asha Rani and another Versus Awas Ayukt and Principal Secretary Awas Evam Sahari Niyojan Uttar Pradesh Shashan and 5 others 2. Writ - C No. 31405 of 2026: Shahnaz Bano and 4 others Versus Awas Ayukt and Principal Secretary Awas Evam Sahari Niyojan and 4 others Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Instructions filed by the learned standing counsel, are taken on record. 2. In all the three writ petitions, we find that the petitioners and the Awas Evam Vikas Parishad had entered into agreements. The grievance raised before this Court is that, although internal communications were made, no final payment has been made to the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, namely, Shri Dhruv Narayan Mishra in Writ-C No. 30171 of 2026, Shri Punit Kumar Gupta in Writ-C No. 30330 of 2026, and Shri Ajit Singh in Writ-C No. 31405 of 2026, have stated that, if any Board Meeting is held, the entire record pertaining to the three writ petitions shall be placed before the State Government, i.e. respondent No. 1 for appropriate decision. 4. In view of the above, we direct that a Board Meeting be convened within a period of 20 days from today, and thereafter, the State Government, in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajit Singh, C.S.C., Dhruv Narayan Mishra, Pranjal Mehrotra, Punit Kumar Gupta, Punit Kumar Upadhyay Narendra Singh and 2 others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 8 others .....Respondent(s) exercise of its powers under Section 49 of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965, shall take an appropriate decision within a period of two months. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, no further order is required to be passed. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 5, 2026 Mukesh Kr. WRIC No. 30171 of 2026 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad