HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 4035 of 2026 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. 1. While no interference may be made with the demand notice creating demand of road tax Rs. 3,37,334/- on Motor Vehicle bearing Registration U.P.61-D-4667, on further query, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner states that some time may be granted to the petitioner to pay off the defaulted demand. 2. To that learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with a direction, subject to the petitioner depositing the entire defaulted demand of road tax on the above described Motor Vehicle within a period of three months from today, no recovery charges may be demanded from the petitioner as the entire amount would have been paid off in compliance to direction issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. If however the petitioner fails to deposit any amount of the disputed demand, noticed above the petitioner shall not be entitled to any benefit of this order. October 5, 2026 Shweta Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Siyaram Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad