[2026:RJ-JP:13299-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 266/2026 Balram Sharma S/o Late Shri Umashankar Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 34, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Rajasthan) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. Secretary, Department Of Mines, Government Of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 3. The Secretary, Department Of Mines And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 4. The Additional Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests, Central Region, Ministry Of Environment And Forests, B- 1/72, Sector-A, Aliganj, Lucknow-226020 5. The District Collector, Sikar (Rajasthan) 6. Sub Divisional Officer, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar 7. The Tehsildar, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar 8. Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Sikar 9. Assistant Mining Engineer, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar 10. M/s Ojaswi Marbles And Granites Pvt. Ltd., 19-C, Old Fatehpura, Udaipur ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rahul Kashyap For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 30/03/2026 1. The instant civil writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- [2026:RJ-JP:13299-DB] (2 of 3) [SAW-266/2026] “a) Quash and set aside the order dated 13.03.2026 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1201/2024 passed by learned Single Judge; b) Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 26.05.2015 issued by Office of Regional Controller of Mines, Ajmer; c) Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 02.02.2016 passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar in Application No.96/2011; d) Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 18.10.2021 passed by Tehsildar, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar; e) Quash and set aside the subsequent proceedings thereto with regard to lands in question situated in village Ramalyas, Tehsil Neem ka Thana, District Sikar; f) Declare the Khatedari of the land admeasuring 7/1 admeasuring 2.72 hectare, khasra no.8/1 admeasuring 1.77 hectare, khasra no.304 admeasuring 3.65 hectare, 305/5 admeasuring 53.84 hectare, khasra no.306/1 admeasuring 22.57 hectare, khasra no.307 admeasuring 18.39 hectare, khasra no.308 admeasuring 27.86 hectare, khasra no.309 admeasuring 12.05 hectare and khasra no.360 admeasuring 23.59 hectare, total 166.14 hectare situated in village Ramalyas, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar in absolute ownership, rights, title & possession in in the name of initially seven Allottess and their legal heirs including the appellant and further the land be entered in revenue record in their names as registered before passing of the impugned order dated 18.10.2021 g) Any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the Appellant.” 2. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that the contentions raised in the present petition and issue involved herein stand already decided by this court vide order dated 18.12.2025 having one petition of the similar nature in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 59/2023, wherein we passed the following order:- “26. We notice that the entire project has been stalled on account of the litigation initiated by the concerned person Balram Sharma, who apparently has abused the process of law for extraneous purpose and considerations. Such project, which would be in the interest of public ought not be stalled on account of unscrupulous litigants. We expect the steel plant to come into operation as soon as possible. 27. Consequently, the D.B. Civil Special Appeal (writ) No. 59/2023: Smt. Prem Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan [2026:RJ-JP:13299-DB] (3 of 3) [SAW-266/2026] and Ors, is dismissed with cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to be paid by Balram Sharma, the Power of Attorney holder, recoverable as arrears of land revenue and both D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4195/2025: Geetanjali Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and ors. and D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15114/2016: Ojaswi Marbles And Granites Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors., are allowed in terms of our directions, as above. 3. In view of the above, we dismiss the instant special appeal (writ). (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ ashu /14