Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:3444
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 714 of 2004
1. Ramdhani Bhagat, son of Late Harnarain Bhagat (dead, substituted vide order dated 06.01.2025) 1(a) Sulochana Devi, aged about 62 years, w/o Late Ramdhani Bhagat 1(b) Vidya Nand Bhagat, son of Late Ramdhani Bhagat 1(c) Sunil Kumar Bhagat, son of Late Ramdhani Bhagat 1(d) Pappu Kumar Bhagat, son of Late Ramdhani Bhagat All Residents of village Jawari, P.O. Ramgarh, P.S. Ramgarh, District Dumka 1(e) Ranjana Devi, W/o Sarwan Kumar Munna, D/o Late Ramdhani Bhagat, R/o Shiv Sundari Road, Shiv Pahar Dumka, P.O. & P.S. Dumka, District Dumka
… … Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Commissioner, Dumka Division, Dumka
3. The Settlement Officer, Santhal Parganas, Dumka
4. The Assistant Settlement Officer, Attestation Camp, Ramgarh, Dumka
… … Respondent 1st Party
5. Sudheshwari Devi, wife of Jagarnath Bhagat.
6. Devika Devi, daughter of Jagarnath Bhagat
7. Baijnath Bhagat (dead, Substituted vide order dated 04.01.2010) 7(a) Rajendra Bhagat (this writ petition stood rejected on 07.12.2017 in terms of order dated 30.11.2017) 7(b) Shyamanand Bhagat 7(c) Dhenej Bhagat All sons of Late Baijnath Bhagat, resident of village Jawari, P.S. Ramgarh, District Dumka 7(d) Most. Monarma Devi, D/o Late Baijnath Bhagat, wife of Suresh Bhagat, resident of village Kumaharpara, P.O., P.S. & Dist. Dumka
8. Raghunath Bhagat (dead, Substituted vide order dated 04.01.2010) 8(a) Domain Bhagat (this writ petition stood rejected on 07.12.2017 in terms of order dated 30.11.2017) 8(b) Kishori Bhagat Both sons of Late Raghunath Bhagat, resident of village Saraiyahat, P.O. Saraiyahat, P.S. + District Dumka
2026:JHHC:3444
2
8(c) Gori Devi, daughter of Late Raghunath Bhagat, wife of Baijnath Bhagat, resident of village Saraiyahaat, P.O. & P.S. Saraiyahat, District Dumka (this writ petition stood rejected on 07.12.2017 in terms of order dated 30.11.2017)
9. Ramniwas Bhagat
10. Ganesh Bhagat
11. Nityananad Bhagat
12. Damodar Bhagat. All Sons of Ramjanam Bhagat @ Ramjanand. All Residents of Village Jawari, P.S. Ramgarh, Dist. Dumka
13. Ramanand Bhagat, son of Balram Bhagat (dead, Substituted vide
order dated 04.01.2010) 13(a) Kishnanand Bhagat 13(b) Abhaya Bhagat 13(c) Bablu Bhagat (dead, substituted vide order dated 30.11.2017)
13(c)(i) Bimla Devi @ Doli, wife of Late Bablu Bhagat 13(c)(ii) Munna Bhagat, son of Late Bablu Bhagat (This writ petition stood rejected as against respondent nos. 13(c)(i) and 13(c)(ii) on 07.12.2017 in terms of order dated 30.11.2017)
13(d) Raju Bhagat 13(e) Putul Bhagat 13(f) Tublu Bhagat All sons of Late Ramanand Bhagat, resident of village Jawari, P.S. Ramgarh, P.O. & District Dumka
… … Respondents
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioners
: Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate
Ms. Maksuda Khatun, Advocate
For the Respondents
: Mr. Manjul Prasad, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, Advocate
Mr. Akhouri Prakhar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Aman Kedia, Advocate
---
20/9th February 2026
2026:JHHC:3444
3
1. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: -
“for quashing the order dated 8.8.2003 (Annexure-1) passed by the Commissioner, Santhal Parganas Division, Dumka (Respondent No.2) in R.M.R. No. 82/84-85 (Annexure-1) upholding the order dated 29.5.1984 (Annexure-2) passed by the Settlement Officer, Santhal Parganas, Dumka (Respondent no.3) in Tanaza Appeal No. 1/83 affirming the order dated 13.10.82 (Annexure-3) passed by the Assistant Settlement Officer (Respondent No.4) in Tasdik Tanaja Case No. 1 of Mauza Jawari No. 42, P.S. Ramgarh, District Dumka. By the aforesaid orders the claim of the petitioner over the half of the lands of J.B.No. 21 of Mauza Jawari No. 42 P.S. Ramgarh, District Dumka on the basis of being the adopted son of one of the recorded tenants, namely, Hernarain Bhagat stood rejected.”
3. The learned senior counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the matter revolves around legality and validity of adoption of Ramdhani Bhagat by Hernarain Bhagat. He submits that the aforesaid point was subject-matter of consideration in S.A. No. 204/2007 arising out of Title Suit No. 70/1974 and the said Second Appeal No. 204 of 2007 has been remanded to the learned 1st appellate court vide order dated 27.01.2026. The learned senior counsel has also submitted that the Second Appeal was filed by Ramdhani Bhagat, who is the original writ petitioner even before this Court. 4. The learned counsels for the parties jointly submitted that ultimately the issue arising in this case will also get settled once the point regarding adoption of Ramdhani Bhagat by Hernarain Bhagat is settled. The learned counsels jointly submitted that there is no point keeping this writ petition pending. It may be observed that the parties may take appropriate steps depending upon the final outcome of the matter regarding adoption which is now pending before the learned 1st appellate court on account of remand order passed in 2nd appeal. 2026:JHHC:3444
4
5.
Considering the submissions and with the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of observing that the parties may take appropriate steps once the matter regarding adoption of Ramdhani Bhagat (the original petitioner of this case) is ultimately settled in the proceeding arising out of Title Suit No. 70/1974 which is now pending before the learned 1st appellate court. 6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is closed. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 09.02.2026
Uploaded On: 14.02.2026
Mukul/-