Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13571 (KAR)

T V VIKAS v. KUMARI THANUSHREE V

WP/1748/2026 · 2026-04-10

K Manmadha Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20161 WP No. 1748 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 1748 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: T.V. VIKAS S/O LATE T.S.VIJAYAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT SHAMBAVI NILAYA, 8TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMI NAGARA, NEAR RAILWAY TRACK, TUMAKURU-572 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.C.VIJAYA KUMAR.,ADVOCATE) AND: KUMARI THANUSHREE V D/O VIKAS T.V., AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, MINOR REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. T.S.GAYITHRI, W/O T.V.VIKAS, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT SRI LAKSHMI VENKATESHWRA NILAYA, BEHIND WESTERN EXTENSION SCHOOL, AGRAHARA, TUMAKURU-572 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH V.B.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20161 WP No. 1748 of 2026 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT TUMAKURU IN CRL. MISC NO. 94/2022 DATED 01.12.2025 ON I A NO. VI FILED UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 10(A) OF CPC R/W SEC 112 OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT AND IA NO. IXX FILED UNDER SECTION 112 OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT AS PER ANNX-H BY ISSUING WRIT OF CERTIORARI. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER The matter was reserved for orders on 13.03.2026. When the order was about to be pronounced, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared before the Court and submitted that he will withdraw the petition and filed a memo to that effect. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 55