[2026:RJ-JP:30730] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10861/2026 CNR: RJHC020555362026 | URN: CW / 24124U / 2026 Ravi Dadarwal S/o Sh. Sita Ram Dadarwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Mukam Post-Kanwarpura, Via Gathwari, Tehsil- Amer, District- Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Bank Of India, Through Branch Manager, Address- Branch Chandwaji, District- Jaipur (Raj). 2. State Bank Of India, Through Regional Director, Address- Legal Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patana, Bihar 80001. 3. Director, Reserve Bank Of India, Address-18Th Floor, Central Office Building, Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai- 400001. 4. Director, General Of Police (Cyber Crime), Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)-302015 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Prakash Bunkar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Devakriti Vashishtha with Ms. Sunita Meena on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Mr. Varun Sharma on behalf of Ms. Anita Agarwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 06/08/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with a prayer to direct the respondent-Bank to defreeze the account, maintained by the petitioner with State Bank of India. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that account of the petitioner has been freezed on the basis of [2026:RJ-JP:30730] (2 of 2) [CW-10861/2026] information provided by the Investigating Authority. It has also been informed that on account of complaint with regard to committing alleged cybercrime, there are disputed transactions of Layer-I in the bank account of the petitioner. 3. The said statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-Bank is supported by learned counsel for the respondent-Department. 4. Under these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for granting liberty to approach the Competent Authority in view of Clause 10 of Grievance Redressal Mechanism of Section-III of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 02.01.2026 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to avail his remedy under the aforesaid SOP and the Authorities are directed to dispose of the grievance of the petitioner within the timeframe given in the SOP. 6. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case. 8. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 20/DAKSH