Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1357 (CHH)

DILESHWAR YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3738/2020 · 2026-03-26

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:14655 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3738 of 2020 1 - Dileshwar Yadav S/o Shri Chhedilal Yadav Aged About 48 Years Working In Municipal Corporation , Bilaspur , R/o Village Kasturba Nagar, Bilaspur , Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Mithila D/o Shri Chhedi Lal Aged About 40 Years Working In Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur , R/o 27kholi, Bilaspur , Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhavan , Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Joint Director Department Of Urban Administration And Development , R.D.A. Bhavan, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) HARNEET KAUR Digitally signed by HARNEET KAUR Date: 2026.03.28 11:51:46 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.K. Sinha, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 and 2/State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, P.L. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advcoate SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Judgment on Board 27.03.2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by the order dated 30/04/2025 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPS/482/2016 (Girish Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.) and other connected matters. 2. The relevant portion of the said order dated 30/04/2025 passed in WPS/482/2016 has been extracted below :- “10. Thus considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that the petitioners are working as daily wagers for a considerable long time, that they have not been regularized as yet for technical reasons though the similarly situated persons have received the benefit of regularization, the impugned orders denying them regularization manifestly appear to be discriminatory and being so they are hereby set aside. The respondents are directed to regularize the services of the petitioners from the date of resolution passed in the meeting of Mayor-in-Council, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur dated 29.09.2008. They are held entitled for all consequential benefits including increments, pension etc. 11. Let this exercise of regularization of the services of the petitioners be positively 3 completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.” 3. Thus, in view of the aforesaid terms, this writ petition is disposed of. Municipal Corporation is directed to take steps as per the aforesaid order passed by this Court in WPS/482/2016. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet