Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13567 (PNJ)

MS SHREE SHYAM STEEL INDUSTRIES v. UNION OF INDIA

CWP/7568/2026 · 2026-03-19

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-7568-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M/s Shree Shyam Steel Industries Union of India and CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Aman Bansal Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Abhav Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present petition is disposed of with a provide to the petitioner all material on the basis whereof the petitioner’s GST registration has been suspended and is further sought to be permanently cancelled with a further direction to respondent No.3 that after the af petitioner and it is permitted to file its response thereto, to decide the petitioner’s case with regard to cancellation of his GST registration in a time 2. Learned objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayers made on the petitioner’s behalf. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we find the afore alternate prayers made on the petitioner’s behalf to be reasonable. Learn respondent has also no objection to the acceptance of these prayers. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to provide to the petitioner, within one week, all material on the basis whereof the registration was suspended and is further sought to be permanently cancelled to which Sr. No. 153 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Shree Shyam Steel Industries Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Aman Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner Ridhi Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Abhav Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents-CBIC. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be the present petition is disposed of with a provide to the petitioner all material on the basis whereof the petitioner’s GST registration has been suspended and is further sought to be permanently cancelled with a further direction to respondent No.3 that after the afore information is supplied to the petitioner and it is permitted to file its response thereto, to decide the petitioner’s case with regard to cancellation of his GST registration in a time Learned counsel for the respondent-revenue, upon objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayers made on the petitioner’s After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we find the afore alternate prayers made on the petitioner’s behalf to be reasonable. Learn respondent has also no objection to the acceptance of these prayers. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to provide to the petitioner, within one week, all material on the basis whereof the registration was suspended and is further sought to be permanently cancelled to which IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7568-2026 Date of decision : 19.03.2026 .… Petitioner ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to provide to the petitioner all material on the basis whereof the petitioner’s GST registration has been suspended and is further sought to be permanently cancelled with a further direction to respondent No.3 that after the afore information is supplied to the petitioner and it is permitted to file its response thereto, to decide the petitioner’s case with regard to cancellation of his GST registration in a time-bound manner. revenue, upon instructions, has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayers made on the petitioner’s After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we find the afore alternate prayers made on the petitioner’s behalf to be reasonable. Learned counsel for the respondent has also no objection to the acceptance of these prayers. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to provide to the petitioner, within one week, all material on the basis whereof the petitioner’s GST registration was suspended and is further sought to be permanently cancelled to which VANDANA 2026.03.25 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-7568-2026 the petitioner shall have a right to file a response within one week thereafter. After 10 days of receipt of the petitioner’s response, respondent No.3 s the issue with regard to the petitioner’s cancellation of GST registration but only after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his authorized representative. 19.03.2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable the petitioner shall have a right to file a response within one week thereafter. After 10 days of receipt of the petitioner’s response, respondent No.3 s the issue with regard to the petitioner’s cancellation of GST registration but only after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his authorized representative. (DEEPAK SIBAL (LAPITA BANERJI Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No the petitioner shall have a right to file a response within one week thereafter. After 10 days of receipt of the petitioner’s response, respondent No.3 shall then finally decide the issue with regard to the petitioner’s cancellation of GST registration but only after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his authorized representative. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.03.25 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document