Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13564 (HP)

KANTHO DEVI AND ANR v. BALWANT SINGH AND ORS

CMP/12042/2026 · 2026-06-30

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Kantho Devi & anr. Vs. Balwant Singh & ors. CMP(M) No.224 of 2026 30.06.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants. Ms. Reeta Hingmang, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 3. Mr. Vidush Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Ms. Pooja Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Respondent No.6 already ex parte. CMP No.12042 of 2026 The present application has been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No.2, under Order 9, Rule 7 read with Section 151 of CPC for setting aside ex-parte order dated 07.05.2026. No reply is intended to be filed to the application. Heard. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and ex-parte order dated 07.05.2026, passed against applicant/respondent No.2, is set aside and respondent No.2 is permitted to join the proceedings. The application stands disposed of. CMP(M) No.224 of 2026 Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 3 states that she does not want to file any reply to the application. Learned counsel for the other contesting respondents pray for and are granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge June 30, 2026 (V.Himalvi)