(1) 35-WP-2973-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2973/2026 HIND MAHA MINERAL LLP, YESAMBA, NAGPUR VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, MUMBAI AND ORS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Saurabh Malpani a/w. Mr. S.S. Sarda Advocate for the Petitioner (s) (through VC). Mr. S.A. Ashirgade, Addl. GP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 01, 2026. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2390/2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2973/2026. 1. Heard. 2. By the present application, the Applicant (Original Respondent No. 3) is seeking to recall the order dated 04.09.2026 to the extent of imposing cost of Rs. 50,000/- upon the Applicant. 3. The cost was imposed on the count that the Applicant did not take corrective steps despite being pointed out that the impugned order was unsustainable. 4. Mr. S.A. Ashirgade, learned Additional Government Pleader, has tendered across the Bar affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 2, who has sworn the affidavit in reply. 5. The Applicant (Original Respondent No. 3), Ms. Pranjali Kadu, who has passed the impugned order, and Respondent No. 2, Mr. Prashant Patil, are present in the Court. Both have tendered an unconditional apology. Kartikeya (2) 35-WP-2973-2026 6. We have interacted with the Applicant (Original Respondent No. 3) and Respondent No. 2. They have realised the mistake. Thus, the apology tendered appears to be by heart. 7. That being so, and for the reasons set out in the application, the same is allowed. The order dated 04.09.2026 to the extent of imposing cost of Rs. 50,000/- upon the Applicant (Original Respondent No. 3) is recalled. The rest of the order stands intact. 8. The application is disposed of in terms of above. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kartikeya