2026:JHHC:7586 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 924 of 2026 --------- Mukesh Kumar @ Mukku, aged about 25 years, son of Amrika Saw, resident of village Mahugai Kala, P.O. & P.S. Barkagaon, Dist. Hazaribagh. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amitesh Kr. Geasen, Advocate Ms. Ruchi Mukti, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, A.P.P. --------- 03/ 18.03.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 111(2)(ii), 111(4), 61(2)(a) of BNS r/w Section 25(1-B) (a), 25(6), 26, 25(7), 35 of the Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. Learned counsel further submits that no specific role has been attributed against the petitioner regarding firing, rather those are alleged to have been done by Tushar Mishra and Rahul Dubey. From perusal of FIR it is crystal clear that there is no victim nor there is any person who is injured. His name appeared on the confessional statement of co-accused Tushar Mishra. Learned counsel further submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 25.09.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation against the petitioner and the period of custody coupled with fact that charge-sheet has been submitted; I am inclined to enlarge the 2026:JHHC:7586 2 petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Ramgarh, in connection with Patratu (Bhurkunda) P.S. Case No. 233 of 2025, corresponding to G.R. No. 927 of 2025, further corresponding to S.T. No. 05 of 2026. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 18th March, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 19.03.2026