- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20003 WP No. 25390 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 25390 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SMT. SIDDALINGAMMA W/O LATE VEERASANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS, NO.25/Y, 14TH MAIN, 58TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.R. KRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 002. 2. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, RAJAJINAGAR ZONE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20003 WP No. 25390 of 2025 RAMAMANDIRA SUB DIVISION. NO.7, I FLOOR, M. VISHVESWARIAHA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, RAJAJINAGARA, BENGALURU-560 010. 4. SMT V.ANITHA, D/O SRI VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, NO.24/Y, 14TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.V. BATHE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. N. MAHALINGA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R4 (ABSENT)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-E,F,G AND K AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION AS PER LAW AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20003 WP No. 25390 of 2025 ORAL ORDER On the allegation that respondent No.4 has put up construction in violation of building byelaws and sanction plan, the petitioner complained to respondent Nos.1 to 3 - Greater Bengaluru Authority. As no action was taken, the present writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct respondent Nos.1 to 3 - Greater Bengaluru Authority to initiate appropriate action on the representation made by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 is absent. 3. Learned counsel for Greater Bengaluru Authority, upon instruction, submits that subsequent to filing of the writ petition, respondent Nos.1 to 3 have inspected the property of respondent No.4 and have found that there are deviations in the construction being put up and suitable action has been initiated against respondent No.4 and the same will be taken to its logical end. 4. His submission is placed on record. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20003 WP No. 25390 of 2025 5. For the aforementioned reason, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 - Greater Bengaluru Authority to initiate appropriate action against the construction being put up by respondent No.4 in accordance with law. The same shall be taken to its logical end within a period of 4 months from today. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE NS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52