THE GOA HOUSING BOARD REP. THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN / BOARD OF DIRECTORS v. YESHWANT NARAYAN REDKAR AND 2 ORS.
CAREV/20/2026 · 2026-10-01
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13550 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13550 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
902-CAREV-20 OF 2026.DOC Suchitra IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO.20/2026 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.37/2012 THE GOA HOUSING BOARD REP. THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN / BOARD OF DIRECTORS … APPLICANT Versus YESHWANT NARAYAN REDKAR AND 2 ORS. … RESPONDENTS Mr H. D. Naik, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Sudesh Usgaonkar, Senior Advocate with Ms Marie Rosette Pereira, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Ms S. Linhares, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent State. CORAM:
VALMIKI MENEZES, J. DATED:
1st OCTOBER 2026 P.C. :
1. Consent Terms signed by the parties and their respective Advocates, which are dated 01.10.2026, are placed on record. he Consent Terms are marked ‘Y’ for identiication. he parties have signed the same before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court and are present in the Court today. he Applicant – Goa Housing Board, whose Managing Director Ms Siddhi Halarnkar is present in the Court, admitted the execution of these Consent Terms and the fact that they are executed by the Goa Housing Board under Resolution dated 01.07.2026 passed by the Board. Page 1 of 3 1st October 2026
902-CAREV-20 OF 2026.DOC
2. he Respondent Yeshwant Narayan Redkar, who is the original Plaintif in Civil Suit No.23/2010 and Respondent in First Appeal No.37/2012, is also present and has admitted signing these terms. All parties record that the terms are signed and executed of their free-will and without any undue inluence/ coercion. 3. After considering the entire history of the matter, which is incidentally recorded in paragraphs 1 to 9 of the Consent Terms, I am of the opinion that the Consent Terms are fair to all the parties. 4. he circumstances under which these Consent Terms are iled in a Civil Review Application are also stated in the Consent Terms and recorded in the order of 18.06.2026 of this Court. hese Consent Terms which constitute a decree between the parties, are executed in the original civil proceedings i.e. Civil Suit No.23/2010. 5. he plan referred to in the Consent Terms, which has received Provisional Approval of the Town and Country Planning Department, South Goa at Margao and has now received approval/development permission from the Cuncolim Municipal Council on 10.09.2026 is part of the record of the Review Application and was marked ‘X’ by this Court on 18.06.2026 and is on the ile.
he plot in question is depicted in Red on the said plan for identiication and the said plan produced on the ile of 1st October 2026
902-CAREV-20 OF 2026.DOC the Review Application and shall be treated as an integral part of the Consent Terms. 6. In view of the statement made in paragraph 11 of the Consent Terms, Respondent Nos.2 and 3 shall stand dropped/deleted. Amendment to the cause title shall be carried out forthwith. 7. he Review Application is disposed and a fresh decree shall be drawn up by the Appellate Court i.e. this Court, in First Appeal No.37/2012 in terms of the above “Consent Terms”. 8. Registry to act in terms of this order and draw a fresh decree which shall be in substitution of Decree dated 10.11.2023. VALMIKI MENEZES, J. 1st October 2026 Signed by: SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 03/10/2026 14:53:02