Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13549 (ALL)

SMT. SHABINA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/35374/2026 · 2026-10-04

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35374 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No. 82 of 278) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Brijesh Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Ram Mohit Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 74 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 132, 121(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 324(4), 109, 127(2), 3(5), B.N.S. 2023 and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, Police Station Sirsakalar, District Jalaun, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants has argued that they are absolutely innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations are per se false. There are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons including the present applicants. The applicants are ladies and have been deliberately added as an accused by the injured person, who is a police constable. The injuries otherwise are simple in nature as no bone injury was observed by the doctor in the X-ray report of the skull. The applicants have no criminal history and are in jail since 05.07.2026. They undertake to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicants could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek, Brajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Shabina And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) the view that the applicants have made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicants- Smt. Shabina and Ruksar, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that they shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 5, 2026 Suraj Srivastav BAIL No. 35374 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad