MAHESH KUMAR VERMA S/O SHRI HARBAKSH VERMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15338/2026 · 2026-08-13
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13547 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13547 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:31987] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15338/2026 CNR: RJHC020746182026 | URN: CW / 32658U / 2026 Mahesh Kumar Verma S/o Shri Harbaksh Verma, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Raigaron Ka Mohalla, Chomu District Jaipur. (Presently Posted As Senior Teacher (Ii Grade) Sanskrit At Govt. Varistha Upadhyay Sanskrit, School Morija (218447)- Employee Id No. Rjpa201029004635 ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, De- partment Of Sanskrit Education, Government, Govern- ment Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Directorate Sanskrit Education Rajasthan Jaipur, Second Floor, Block 6, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur.
3. Government Varishtha Upadhyay Sanskrit School, Morija District Jaipur (218447) Through Its Principal. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nav Ratan Singh For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 13/08/2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner could not refute that the petitioners would be covered under the definition of ‘government servant’, as prescribed under Section 2(c) of Rajasthan Civil Services (Service Matters Appellate Tribunals) Act 1976 (for short
“Act of 1976”), nor could the learned counsel for the petitioner refute that the lis in question also falls under the ‘service matters’, as defined under Section 2(f) of the Act of 1976. In view thereof, since the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy available in law, the learned counsel for the
[2026:RJ-JP:31987] (2 of 2) [CW-15338/2026] petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to approach the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal (for short “RAT”) for redressal of his grievance. Considering the oral prayer, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the RAT for redressal of his grievance. If the petitioner files appropriate petition before the RAT within a period of 30 days, the RAT shall adjudicate the same on merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one months. Needless to say, no prejudice to be caused to the petitioner based on any observations made hereinabove. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforementioned liberty being granted. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J 38/Prateek