Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13547 (BOM)

PUNDALIK TUKARAM PARKAR v. GOPINATH VISSU ARSEKAR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS

MCA/197/2022 · 2026-10-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21 MCA 197 2022 Meena IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.197 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.91 OF 2015 PUNDALIK TUKARAM PARKAR ... APPLICANT Versus GOPINATH VISSU ARSEKAR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS ... RESPONDENTS Ms Sailee Kenny and Ms. Neelam Patil, Advocates for the Applicant. Ms. Divya Parab, Advocate (through VC) for the Respondents No.1.1 to 1.6, 5 and 6. CORAM:- VALMIKI MENEZES, J. DATED :- 1st October, 2026 P.C.: 1. For the reasons stated in the application, which are that the process fees were not paid on time due to the mistake of the Advocate, the Application is allowed. First Appeal No. 91 of 2025 shall stand restored to the file. The process fees to serve all the Respondents shall be paid within two weeks from today. If the process fees are paid, notice after admission to be issued to the Respondents, returnable on such date as the Registry fixes. VALMIKI MENEZES, J. 1st October, 2026 Signed by: MEENA VISHAL BHOIR Designation: Private Secretary Date: 03/10/2026 12:37:20