APHC010224602024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 9 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT Between: 1. VAKATI RAVINDRA REDDY, S/O LATE RAMANA REDDY, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.No.6/43, EAST STREET, GUDUR, GUDUR MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 1. SRI ANAKAPALLI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT ABOUT 55 YEARS, COMMISSIONER, GUDUR MUNICIPALITY, GUDUR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. MR Y MALLIKHARJUNA RAO, COMMISSIONER, GUDURU MUNICIPALITY, GUDURU. R 2 IS IMPLEADED AS SUO MOTO AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 14.08.2026 IN CC NO Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. G.JAGADEESWAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): Mr.GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE No: 2789 of 2024 VAKATI RAVINDRA REDDY, S/O LATE RAMANA REDDY, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.No.6/43, EAST STREET, GUDUR, GUDUR MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND SRI ANAKAPALLI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, COMMISSIONER, GUDUR MUNICIPALITY, GUDUR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. MR Y MALLIKHARJUNA RAO, COMMISSIONER, GUDURU MUNICIPALITY, GUDURU. R 2 IS IMPLEADED AS SUO MOTO AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 14.08.2026 IN CC NO-2789 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Contemnor(S): Mr.GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3523] THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA VAKATI RAVINDRA REDDY, S/O LATE RAMANA REDDY, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.No.6/43, EAST STREET, ...PETITIONER KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, COMMISSIONER, GUDUR MUNICIPALITY, MR Y MALLIKHARJUNA RAO, COMMISSIONER, GUDURU MUNICIPALITY, GUDURU. R 2 IS IMPLEADED AS SUO MOTO AS 2789 OF 2024 CONTEMNOR(S): 2 The Court made the following order: (Per NJS, J) In view of the affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent, dated 30.09.2026 and the averments made therein, more particularly Para No.5, this Court is of the considered view that no further orders are necessary in the present Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 09.10.2026 BLV 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA C.C.No.2789 of 2024 Dt: 09.10.2026 BLV