[2026:RJ-JP:32251] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4904/2016 CNR: RJHC020551432016 | URN: CRLMP / 7670U / 2016 Ram @ Raghav son of Shri Ramesh Agarwal, resident of 333, Lalaniyon ka Chowk, Gopalji ka Rasta, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan through the PP Shri Ramesh son of Shri Gyarsi Lal, resident of E/38, Anandpuri, Jaipur- present address "Saubhgya Vila" 111 Moji Colony, JLN Marg, Near Puliya, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar with Mr. Namo Narayan Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP Mr. Virendra Prajapat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/08/2026 1. Misc. petition is field by Harinarayan and Ram @ Raghav under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for seeking direction to operate locker No.260-A open in Central Bank of India, Johri Bazara, Jaipur, pursuance to the direction dated 11.05.2005 in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.167/1994 and 126/1993 and misc. petition No.434/1994 by this Court. 2. Petitioner No.1 Harinarayan has expired and this fact has already been brought on record and amended cause title has already been filed. The petitioner No.2 Ram @ Raghav has attained adulthood (majority) on 24.03.2009. [2026:RJ-JP:32251] (2 of 4) [CRLMP-4904/2016] 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of non-petitioner No.2 Ramesh has no objection in case, in allowing the petition and grant of benefit to petitioner No.2 Ram @ Raghav. 4. On 11.05.2005, this Court with consent of the counsels for the parties, have passed following order:- "In this unfortunate incident out of which these revision petitions arise, the parties have reached an understanding. These proceedings have ultimately come to a point where a happy ending can be seen to an incident which was unfortunate. The parties i.e. the accused against whom cognizance under Section 306 IPC has been taken and father of the deceased against whom charge has been framed under Section 404 IPC have come to an understanding that the offences alleged would not serve the ends of justice. They are not desirous of pursuing the charged against each other and ----- husband of the deceased Surekha has offered to deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with a nationalised bank for five years in the name of Ram @ Raghav born out of the wedlock of Suresh Aggarwal and Surekha. The maternal grandfather Shri Hari Narayan who is undertaking the welfare of the child and helping him in pursuing further studies promises the court to keep it doing so until the boy attains majority and declares himself as an independent. There are certain ornaments which were recovered by the police and are in police custody. The same will be deposited in a locker in a scheduled bank in presence of the parties named [2026:RJ-JP:32251] (3 of 4) [CRLMP-4904/2016] hereinafter. The locker will be operated in presence of Shri Hari Narayan and Shri Suresh Aggarwal after the boy Ram @ Raghav attains majority, with signature of all the three. The fees or rent of the locker will be borne by Shri Suresh Aggarwal. In case, any of the two parties, Shri Hari Narayan or Shri Suresh Aggarwal becomes incapacitated, then instructions can be sought from this Court by moving an application for authorising anybody to operate the locker on Ram @ Raghav attaining the majority. Since, the parties have compromised in the aforesaid fashion, the cognizance taken does not deserve to be sustained and in view of the agreement between the arties, this Court feels that interest of justice would be served if the parties are bound down by the compromise which they have agreed hereinabove. Counsel for the parties, Mr. Biri Singh and Mr. V.P. Bishnoi are appointed as Court Commissioner to see the compliance of the order and in case of violation, report the matter to the Court and the Court in those circumstances will pass appropriate orders. The trial court will release the jewellery in presence of both the parties and the counsel and the same should be deposited in the bank forthwith. The whole exercise should commence within two weeks." 5. A liberty is granted to move to this Court, hence, the parties are before this Court. [2026:RJ-JP:32251] (4 of 4) [CRLMP-4904/2016] 6. Taking note of the subsequent events as admitted by learned counsel for both the parties, the misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is disposed with following directions:- (i) The petitioner No.2 Ram @ Raghav, who is beneficiary under the order dated 11.05.2005 passed by this Court, who attained the adulthood, is entitled to operate locker No.260-A opened in Central Bank of India, Johri Bazar, Jaipur under the orders of this Court. (ii) The petitioner No.2 Ram @ Raghav is also entitled to receive the entire amount on maturity from FDR, which was invested in Punjab National Bank, Johri Bazar, Jaipur. (iii) The Trial Court is directed to issue necessary orders to give effect to this order. 7. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J 18/GAURAV