JITENDRA KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/17351/2021 · 2026-10-04
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13541 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13541 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 17351 of 2021 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Case is called out. None appears for the petitioner(s). Learned Counsel for the State is present. Record goes to show that the case is listed in the category of oldest pending cases in the cause list, for priority hearing. A notice has been placed on the notice board specifically, mentioning that
"old cases up to the year 2022 shall be taken up in the first round itself. In case of non-appearance, matter shall be dismissed as infructuous or otherwise, and in the cases, where the cause of action still survives, the concerned advocates are expected to mark them accordingly in the cause list. Failure to do so, may result in its dismissal as infructuous" but, neither the counsel for the petitioner(s) has/have appeared nor has the case been marked to indicate that the cause of action still survives. This matter is pending since the year 2021. It appears that either the petitioner(s) has/have lost interest in pursuing the matter or it has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 5, 2026 Rahul. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhupendra Pandey, Lakshman Tripathi, Pradeep Kumar Upadhyay, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avneesh Tripathi, C.S.C., V.R. Tiwari, Ved Byas Mishra (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Jitendra Kumar Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad