Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13530 (RAJ)

SHRI ASHOK KUMAR BHATI SON OF ATAR SINGH BHATI v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/9737/2026 · 2026-08-10

Arun Monga, Ashutosh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:31242-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9737/2026 CNR: RJHC020515122026 | URN: CW / 21725U / 2026 Shri Ashok Kumar Bhati Son Of Atar Singh Bhati, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of House No. 362, Falaida Bangar-Ii, Rabupura, Jewar, District -Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh -203135, Partner Of M/s Jai Bajrang Steel Having Its Registered Office At E-41 B, Riico Industrial Area, Khushkhera, Bhiwadi, District Alwar, Rajasthan, 301707 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi-110001 2. The Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax, Commissionerate Alwar, A Block, Surya Nagar, Alwar (Rajasthan)-301001 3. The Additional Commissioner, Cgst Alwar Commissionerate, Adjudication Branch, A Block, Surya Nagar, Alwar (Rajasthan)- 301001 4. The Additional Director General, Directorate General Of Gst Intelligence (Dggi), Jaipur Zonal Unit, C-62, Sarojini Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302001 5. The Senior Intelligence Officer, Group-J/a, Directorate General Of Gst Intelligence, Jaipur Zonal Unit, C-62, Sarojini Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302001 6. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance (Tax Division), Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubham Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Ms. Chelsi Agarwal Mr. Ajay Shukla Mr. Raghav Sharma Mr. Shivam Sharma Ms. Jyoti Sharma [2026:RJ-JP:31242-DB] (2 of 4) [CW-9737/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order(Oral) 10/08/2026 Per: Arun Monga, J. 1. The petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks quashing and setting aside of the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 27.06.2025 and the Order- in-Original dated 29.12.2025, passed by Additional Commissioner, CGST Alwar Commissionerate, whereby GST demand of Rs.30,48,74,806/-, along with interest and penalty for Tax Period: September 2018- December 2022, was raised on the account of excess/wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit by the petitioner. The appeal against the said order could not per force be filed before the Appellate Authority as the online status of the appeal would reveal that the same is time- barred. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner filed the instant writ petition on 25.05.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not avail the appellate remedy within the prescribed period as, despite repeated written requests made during the adjudication proceedings in October and December 2025, copies of the seized records and the documents relied upon by the Respondents were not furnished to him. The said records included invoices, inward registers, stock records, transport documents and account books seized during the search proceedings conducted on 19.10.2022. 2.1 Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner could not file the statutory appeal within the prescribed period as the impugned Order-in-Original dated 29.12.2025 was never effectively communicated to the petitioner and was merely uploaded on [2026:RJ-JP:31242-DB] (3 of 4) [CW-9737/2026] the GST Portal. The petitioner acquired knowledge of the impugned order only subsequently in the year 2026, whereafter, immediate steps were taken to challenge the same. However, by then, the appeal had become time-barred on the GST Portal. 3. Heard and perused the case file. 4. At the outset, learned counsels for the respondents object to the maintainability of the writ petition herein stating that the alternative remedy as provided under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, has not been availed. 5. Statutory remedy by way of an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017 before the Appellate Authority is provided against the impugned Order-in-Original dated 29.12.2026 For ready reference, Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017 reads as under:- “Section 107. Appeals to Appellate Authority.- (1) Any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under this Act or the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act by an adjudicating authority may appeal to such Appellate Authority as may be prescribed within three months from the date on which the said decision or order is communicated to such person." x-x-x-x-x 6. In view of the aforesaid, we are not inclined to directly entertain the writ petition without the petitioner exhausting its alternate statutory remedy. 7. The facts on record reveal that the instant writ petition was filed against the impugned Order-in-Original on 25.05.2026, i.e., after a delay of 27 days beyond the statutory period prescribed for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the RGST/CGST Act, 2017. Having considered the reasons stated by learned counsels for the petitioner, we [2026:RJ-JP:31242-DB] (4 of 4) [CW-9737/2026] are satisfied that the delay occurred due to circumstances beyond the control of the petitioner. 8. Learned counsel for the petitioner, relying on the various Division Bench judgments of this very Court in M/s M R Traders v. UOI1, M/s Molana Construction Company v. Central Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors2, Man Singh Tanwar v. Commissioner, Central goods and Services Tax Department & Ors.3, RPC PSIPL JV Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors4 and RPC PSIPL JV Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors5 argues that sufficient cause of delay in filing the appeal due to circumstances beyond control has been shown and thus appeal be directed to be considered on merits after condoning the delay by this Court. 9. In the judgments cited above, this Court, while allowing the writ petitions, have issued directions to entertain the appeal on merits even if, the same were time barred, provided sufficient cause was shown. 10. Accordingly, the Appellate Authority is directed to entertain the appeal of the petitioner and adjudicate the appeal on merits, provided the same is filed within 30 days of the instant order being uploaded on the website of this court. 11. Disposed of accordingly, with liberty as above. All pending applications also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J (ARUN MONGA),J 27/AARZOO/TUSHAR 1 2026 SCC OnLine RAJ 2115 2 2024 SCC OnLine Raj 3938 3 D.B. CWP 14658/2024 4 D.B. CWP 7260/2025 5 D.B. CWP 11794/2025