[2026:RJ-JP:13274] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1314/2026 Tasleem S/o Juhur, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Aalimev, Police Station Baheen, District Palwal (Haryana) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1893/2026 Robin S/o Ishab @ Chauda, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Aalimev, Police Station Baheen, District Palwal, Haryana. (Currently In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aslam S. Khan Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 30/03/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 250/2025 registered at Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Sections 309(5), 324(4) and 351(2) of BNS. [2026:RJ-JP:13274] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1314/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also contends that the petitioners are in custody since 11.12.2025. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed and conclusion of trial may take long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners that charge-sheet has already been filed; petitioners are in custody since 11.12.2025 and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Tasleem S/o Juhur & Robin S/o Ishab @ Chauda are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:13274] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1314/2026] 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/45-46