Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13519 (KAR)

SRI.R. MUNIRAJA REDDY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9473/2023 · 2026-04-24

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22583 WP No. 9473 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 9473 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.R. MUNIRAJA REDDY, S/O LATE RAMASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT DODDA BANASWADI OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 043. 2. SRI. R SRIDHARA, S/O LATE RAMASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT DODDA BANASWADI OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 043. 3. SRI. R VISHWANATHA, S/O LATE RAMASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT DODDA BANASWADI OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 043. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V B SHIVAKUMAR.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22583 WP No. 9473 of 2023 DR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE POLICE INSPECTOR, BAGALUR POLICE STATION, BAGALUR, BENGALURU-562 149. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 4. SMT. SAROJAMMA ALIAS SAROJAMMA B K, D/O VENKATAPPA, W/O SRI B KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT NO.2567-2, OPPOSITE B.C.M. HOSTEL, MARUTHI NAGAR, SRINIVASAPURA TOWN, KOLAR, KARNATAKA-563 135. 5. SRI. B KRISHNAPPA S/O CHIKKA BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, 6. SRI. K M RAJUBABU ALIAS RAJA BABU K M S/O LATE CHIKKA BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 7. SMT. R HINUTHA, D/O SRI. K M RAJUBABU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, 8. SRI. K SRINIVAS, S/O SRI. B KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 9. KUM JEEVITHASHREE D/O K SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, SINCE MINRO REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER SRI.K SRINIVAS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22583 WP No. 9473 of 2023 RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 9 ARE R/AT 2567-2, OPPOSITE B.C.M. HOSTEL, MARUTHI NAGAR, SRINIVASAPURA TOWN, KOLAR, KARNATAKA-563 135. 10. SRI. BALAADARSH, S/O AUGUSTINA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.82/2, 7TH MAIN, BLESSING GARDEN ROAD, GOVINDAPPA LAYOUT, BYRATHI BANGALORE NORTH, BENGALURU-560 077. 11. SRI. KOTRESHA U, S/O UMESHNAIK, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT NO.105, BYRATHI, NEXT TO CHRIST THE KING CHURCH, DR SRK NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560 077. 12. SRI. RAMESH S/O HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT MARALAKUNTA VILLAGE, JALA (HOBLI), YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 157. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI.NAVEEN BIDDAPPA.,ADVOCATE FOR R11; R10 AND R12 AR SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R2 AND 3 TO PROTECT THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONERS IN PURSUANCE OF COMPLAINT DTD 10/03/2023 AND ENDORSEMENT DTD 15/03/2023 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22583 WP No. 9473 of 2023 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer. “Wherefore, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to: (a) For a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction directing the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the property of the petitioners in pursuance of complaint dated 10.03.2023 and endorsement dated 15/03/2023 as per annexure-A and B (b) Cost of the petition.” 2. A writ petition seeking a prayer of this nature cannot be entertained, the Court cannot direct the respondents to protect the property of the petitioners in pursuance of complaint dated 10.03.2023. The petitioners’ remedy is elsewhere. When the matter came up on 23.04.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption for ‘dismissal’. In spite of the fact that the matter is listed for dismissal, today also there is no representation. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter. In that view of the matter, this Court is passing the following: - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22583 WP No. 9473 of 2023 ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. ii. All pending I.As, if any, in the petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28