1 2026:CGHC:20612 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3814 of 2026 1 - Smt. Mamta Paraste W/o Santosh Kumar Kurre Aged About 47 Years Posted As Lecturer At Government Higher Secondary School (Swami Atmannnad Government English Medium School) Sakri, Block Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions (D P I) Through Its Director, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director School Education Division Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Shweta Dixit Presently Posted As Lecturer At Government Higher Secondary School (Swami Atmanand Government English Medium School) Sakri, Block Takhatpur, District Bilaspur 7 - Smt. Shalini Rai Presently Posted As Lecturer At Government Higher Secondary School (Swami Atmanand Government English Medium School) Sakri, Block Takhatpur, District Bilaspur ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.05.06 10:40:55 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Sibasish Mishra, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Shahil Singh, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 04/05/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 01.08.2025 (Annexure P/1) issued by the Joint Director at Divisional Level Rationalization Committee Bilaspur, (C.G.) 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quash the impugned order dated 27.06.2025 (Annexure P/2) issued by the District Rationalization Committee, Bilaspur (C.G.). 10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside/the quash impugned posting order dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P/3) issued by the District Education Officer Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 10.4 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other writ/ writs, order/ orders, relief/ reliefs in favor of the petitioners, which the Hon'ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that petitioner is posted in Swami Atmanand Government English Medium School (SAGES), Sakri, Block – Takhatpur, District Bilaspur 3 and under the rationalization policy he has been transferred to Government Higher Secondary School, Semartal, Block – Bilha, District Bilaspur. The school in which petitioner is posted in running is two shifts Hindi medium and English medium. According to the directions issued by the State Government, the teachers working in a school in two shifts, are not to be transferred under the rationalization policy. He also contended that teachers junior to the petitioner were declared as excess however, they were not shifted by transfer to other school. 3. Counsel for the State submits that against the dismissal of representation submitted before the Divisional Level Committee, petitioner is having alternate remedy available to him to submit a representation before State Level Committee. 4. At this stage counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. 5. In view of the objection raised by counsel for the respondent, petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to submit representation before the State Level Committee and direction be issued to the concerned Committee/authority to take decision on the representation at the earliest. 6. On due consideration of the submission of learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit representation/application before the State Level Committee, and in the event, such 4 representation is submitted the concerned Committee/Authority shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within further period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi