- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13112 WP No. 10332 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 10332 OF 2025 (SCST) BETWEEN: PRABHAKAR S/O LATE MANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS A.K. COLONY. NELLINAKOPPA HOSUR (SHIKARIPURA). SHIKARIPURA (TQ). SHIVAMOGGA(D) - 577427 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDESH.H.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIVAMOGGA, SHIVAMOGGA DIST- 577 201. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAGARA-SUB-DIVISION, SAGARA – 577 401 SHIVAMOGGA DIST. 3. SRI. CHUNDI HUCHARAYAPPA, S/O DASAPPA SINCE DEAD BY LRS LATE SADASHIVAPPA S/O CHUNDI HUCHARAYAPPA DEAD BY LRS NAGARATHANAMMA, W/O. CHUNDI HUCHARAYAPPA, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13112 WP No. 10332 of 2025 AGE ABOUT 75 YEARS 3(a). SHASHIDHARA S/O. SADAKSHARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 3(b). MEGHARAJ S/O. SADAKSHARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 3(c). KASTHURI, S/O. SADAKSHARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 3(d). LATHA, S/O. SADAKSHARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO. 3 TO 3(d) ARE R/A. ISOOR VILLAGE,, SHIKARIPURA TOWN- 577427 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 577201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN NO. PTCL. CR 9/1988-89 ON THE FILE OF R2 AUTHORITY AND ALSO RECORDS IN NO. SC/ST 11/2000 ON THE FILE OF 1ST RESPONDENT AUTHORITYii) QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS ORDER DTD. 05/08/2004 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AUTHORITY IN NO. SC/ST 11/2000 VIDE ANNX-A BEING TOTALLY ARBITRARY, ERRONEOUS, OPPOSED TO LAW EQUITY AND JUSTICE AND WITHOUT JURISDICTION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13112 WP No. 10332 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 18.02.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 04.03.2026 for dismissal." 2. Office objections have not been complied with. 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2