1 ( 2026:HHC:25438 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 357 of 2026 Decided on: 30.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Satya Nand & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus M. Sudha Devi & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 22.06.2026 alongwith copy of Office Order of even date, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to the directions passed by this Court, benefit has been extended to the petitioners, vide order dated 22.06.2026, by passing a detailed speaking order. 2. Since judgment under reference stood duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:25438 ) passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to assail Office Order dated 22.06.2026, in accordance with law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 30th June, 2026 Judge (raman)