Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13507 (CHH)

VATAN KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3783/2025 · 2026-01-04

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2026:CGHC:305-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3783 of 2025 1 - Vatan Kumar S/o Sudheer Kumar, Aged About 26 Years R/o 60/295, Avadh Vihar, Muzaffarnagar, P.O. Muzaffarnagar, District Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh 251001 2 - Taran Kumar S/o Sudheer Kumar, Aged About 23 Years R/o 60/295, Avadh Vihar, Muzaffarnagar, P.O. Muzaffarnagar, District Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh 251001 ... Petitioners versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The SHO, Police Station Dantewada, District Dantewada (C.G.) ... Respondent For Petitioners : Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate along with Mr. Samdarsh Nirankari, Advocate For State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy. AG Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ. 05/01/2026 1. Heard Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate along with Mr. Samdarsh Nirankari, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.01.07 10:59:59 +0530 2 / 3 Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Dy. Government Advocate for the respondents/State. 2. By way of the instant petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:- i. That, the entire records pertaining to the present case may kindly be called for the perusal of this Hon'ble Court. ii. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the F.I.R. bearing crime number 32/2025 registered at the Dantewada Police Station, District Dantewada, under sections 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, and 66(D) of the I.T. Act, 2000, on 19.03.2025. iii. That, this Hon'ble Court may be kindly pleased to quash the entire chargesheet, bearing number 84/2025, filed by the Dantewada Police under sections 318(4) and 111(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, and 66(D) of the I.T. Act, 2000, on 15.10.2025. iv. That, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the order taking cognizance passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Dantewada, Chhattisgarh, dated 15.10.2025, in Criminal Case No. 6164 of 2025, State of Chhattisgarh vs Vatan Kumar & Anr., under sections 318(4) and 111(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, in relation with crime no. 32/2025, 3 / 3 and the subsequent entire criminal proceedings, pending in Session Trial/187/2025. v. Any other order, direction, relief that this Hon'ble Court may pass ex debito justitiae. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that two cases have been registered in Allahabad and out of that in one case the Petitioner No.2 Taran Kumar has filed the bail application bearing Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.25254 of 2025 which has been allowed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. He would next submit that in view of the same he wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the above, the instant CRMP is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ashu