Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13504 (JHR)

ABDUR RAKQUIB v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4155/2026 · 2026-05-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:14864] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4155 of 2026 ------ Abdur Rakquib, aged about 23 years, Son of- Sayeed Ansari, Resident of- Center Mohalla, near Badi Masjid, Sithiyo, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, Dist.- Ranchi .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate Ms. Anupama Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-14-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Dhurwa P.S. Case No.177 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No.510 of 2023 (S.T. No.645 of 2024) registered for the offences punishable under Section 341, 323, 324, 326, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant and his family members. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-18 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the allegation against the co-accused Sayeed Ansari is that he was holding a knife but the petitioner was armed with a stick. It is further submitted that the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-V, Ranchi in connection with Dhurwa P.S. Case No.177 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No.510 of 2023 (S.T. No.645 of 2024) with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-14.05.2026-Animesh/