Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13500 (BOM)

RAMLAL BRIJLAL JOSHI AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/392/2020 · 2026-09-28

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

392.20CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 10 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 392 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2076 OF 2016 RAMLAL BRIJLAL JOSHI & OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioners : Mr.Shantanu Rai h/f. Mr.D.P.Palodkar AGP for Respondent-State : Mrs.M.N.Ghanekar Advocate for Respondent no.5 : Mr.Ameet R. Vaidya … CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 28.09.2026 P.C. : 1] The learned counsel holding for Mr.D.P.Palodkar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition can be disposed of since it is in respect of the interim order, but now main Petition has been disposed of. 2] In view of this, nothing survives in the present petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:44683-DB