[2026:RJ-JP:13214] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 4642/2026 Irsad S/o Alladeen, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Udki Dalla, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jeetendra Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 30/03/2026 1. This second bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.441/2025 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for offence(s) under Section(s) 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 313, 61(2) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act. 2. The first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh, after filing of charge-sheet. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in this matter and petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 4. Learned counsel also submits that there is no criminal antecedent against petitioner; he is in custody since 16.12.2025 [2026:RJ-JP:13214] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4642/2026] and no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner; therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, hence, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the said offences involve serious cyber fraud activity. He further submits that there is one complaint against the petitioner on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. Hence, benefit of bail should not be granted to the petitioner. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that investigation has been completed; charge-sheet has been filed and conclusion of trial will take considerable long time, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Therefore, the second bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Irsad S/o Alladeen is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The accused - petitioner is directed to mark his presence before the concerned Police Station on the 17th date of every month till conclusion of trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall forward petitioner's attendance report to the trial Court on the same day of each month. [2026:RJ-JP:13214] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4642/2026] 9. In case of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be at liberty to move an application against the petitioner for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/3