Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13492 (JHR)

SANJAY KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3542/2026 · 2026-05-13

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14691 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3542 of 2026 Sanjay Kumar Das, son of Sukhdev Das … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. PP --- 05/13.05.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026, registered under Section 111 (2) (b), 111 (3), 111 (4), 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2), 61 (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Section 66B, 66C, 66D/84 C of the Information Technology Act, 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II, Deoghar. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having no criminal antecedent is in custody since 11.01.2026. He submits that one mobile and one sim is alleged to have been recovered from possession of the petitioner and one victim is alleged to have been identified. Charge sheet has already been submitted. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. However, the aforesaid submissions are not in dispute. In addition, he submits that 5 crime links have been found against the petitioner. The counter affidavit filed by the State is taken on record. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties, the petitioner having no criminal antecedent and charge sheet having already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II, Deoghar in connection with 2026:JHHC:14691 2 Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:13.05.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:14.05.2026