B.S.L. SEVANIBRIT LICENSE AWASDHARI SANGHARSH SAMITTEE, REP. THR ITS COORDINATOR RAMANUJ SHARMA v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF STEEL, GOVT. OF INDIA
WPC/7434/2025 · 2026-01-08
Rajesh Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1349 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1349 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:351 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.7434 of 2025
.... B.S.L. Sevanibrit License Awasdhari Sangharsh Samittee, represented through its Coordinator namely Ramanuj Sharma, aged about 75 years, son of Lalji Singh, Resident of Qrt. No.-370, Sector-IX-D, Street-35, Near High School-9-A, P.O.- Sector-IX, P.S.-Harla, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand
.… Petitioner
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Steel, Govt. of India, Ispat Bhawan, Lodi Road, New Delhi, P.O., P.S. and Dist.-New Delhi-110001.
2. The Management of Steel Authority of India Limited, A company registered under the Companies Act 1956, through its Chairman, having its Registered Office at Ispat Bhawan, Lodi Road, New Delhi, P.O., P.S. and Dist.-New Delhi-110001.
3. The Bokaro Steel Limited, A unit of Steel Authority of India Limited, through its Chief Managing Director, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. and Dist.-Bokaro.
4. The General Manager, Town Administration (L&E), Bokaro Steel Limited, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. and Dist.-Bokaro.
5. The Deputy General Manager, Town Administration (L&E), Bokaro Steel Limited, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. and Dist.-Bokaro
6. The Senior Manager, Town Administration (L&E), Bokaro Steel Limited, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. and Dist.-Bokaro
.... Respondents
.... CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner
: None For the Respondents
: Mr. Prashant Pallav, A.S.G.I. : Ms. Prerna Jhunjhunwala, Adv.
....
06/08.01.2026
1. Last order dated 18.11.2025 reads as under:-
“None appears on behalf of the petitioner, however, four week’s time is allowed to the learned counsel for the petitioner to remove the surviving defects as pointed out by the office, failing which, this writ petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench.”
2. Today also none appears on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
08.01.2026 Shahid/ Uploaded on 09.01.2026