[2026:JHHC:13614] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3772 of 2026 ------ 1. Mumtaj Ansari @ Md. Momtaj, age about 45 years, Son of Late Nejam Ansari, 2. Noortaj Ansari @ Noorjahan Ansari @ Nurtaj Ansari, age about 37 years, Son of Late Nejam Ansari. Both are Resident of Village- Kudaga Kala, P.O- Semara, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Palamau .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kr. No.2, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-07-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.67 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 190, 191 (2), 191 (3), 115 (2), 118 (1), 117 (2), 109, 126 (2), 329 (4), 303 (2), 351 (2) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder the informant by assaulting him with a Garasa (a heavy sharp cutting weapon). It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the genesis of the occurrence is a petty quarrel between the children of the rival parties. It is also submitted that the petitioners had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 16.03.2026 as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.67 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-07.05.2026-Animesh/