HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 702 of 2017 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Counsel for petitioners states that he has no instructions in the matter. 2. In view of said fact, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instructions. October 8, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Sukh Lal And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) Shambhu Dayal And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad