HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16623 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 06.05.2026 by which the earlier appointment of the petitioner made on 24.11.2025 which was for a fixed term of three years has been cancelled. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that before passing the order dated 06.05.2026, no opportunity was given to the petitioner and no reasons has been recorded by the authorities while canceling the appointment of the petitioner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that it would be appropriate that the order may be set-aside and opportunity may be given to the respondents to pass fresh order after giving opportunity to the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, the order dated 06.05.2026, passed y respondent no. 3 is hereby set-aside and writ petition is allowed. 6. It is further provided that the respondents may pass fresh order, if they so desired, after issuing notice to the petitioner to show cause and after considering the reply of the petitioner, in accordance with law. October 8, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Nandan, Vikas Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Ram Asare Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad