[2026:RJ-JP:30942] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8549/2026 CNR: RJHC020520582026 | URN: CRLMB / 15579U / 2026 Sunil @ Anil S/o Bannaram Singh, R/o Dhani Lagariya Wali, Tan Chirani, P.s. Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 07/08/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.8/2026 registered at Police Station Khetri, District Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections 3, 25 and 25(6) of Arms Act and Sections 111(2)(b) and 111(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that 28 live cartridges were allegedly recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner without any valid licence or permit. He submits that the co-accused, Vikram, has already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.03.2026, and another co-accused, Somdutt, has also been [2026:RJ-JP:30942] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8549/2026] enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.05.2026. He submits that the petitioner is behind bars since 07.03.2026. Though the petitioner has criminal antecedents involving 20 cases, in five of those cases he has already been acquitted, while the remaining cases are still pending. Charge- sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sunil @ Anil S/o Bannaram Singh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Khetri, District Jhunjhunu in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. [2026:RJ-JP:30942] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8549/2026] (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 35/Arun