Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13479 (CHH)

TAMU BHIMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/343/2026 · 2026-02-02

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 343 of 2026 1 - Tamu Bhima S/o Tamu Bodda Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Tamupara, Bedre, Police Station- Jagargunda, District : Sukma, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station- Jagargunda, District : Sukma, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Adv. For State/respondent : Mr. Sumit Singh, Dy. A.G. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 03 / 02 / 2026 1. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 24.11.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge (N.I.A. Act/Scheduled Offences) Dantewada, District - Dantewada (C.G.) in Special N.I.A. Act Case No. 55/2024 whereby the learned special judge has allowed the application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. for summoning further new 17 witnesses for examination. HEERA LAL SAHU Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.02.03 16:44:33 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this petition. However, he prays that the trial Court may be directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection to this proposition put fourth by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, directing the learned concerned trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible. 6. A copy of this order be sent forthwith to the trial Court concerned for information and necessary action, if any. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu