ATHARVA UDAY BONGARDE v. SOU. GEETA YUVRAJ SUTAR AND ANR
IA/1495/2026 · 2026-09-30
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13471 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13471 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
49-IA-1495-2026 (c).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1495 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11023 OF 2023 Atharva Uday Bongarde ...Applicant Versus Sou. Geeta Yuvraj Sutar And Anr ...Respondents …... Adv. Dhairyasheel V. Sutar a/w Adv. Reshma J. A., for Petitioner. Adv. Manoj Patil a/w Adv. Akash M Murudkar and Adv. Kaustubh Rayrikar, Advocate for the Applicant. …..
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. : The applicant, being the purchaser of part of the suit land, seeks impleadment in the writ petition. He is already impleaded in the suit bearing RCS No.253 of 2021 as a defendant.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant undertakes that his client will not create any further third-party interest in the property purchased by him.
3. It is brought to my notice that the applicant purchased part of the suit land on 07.09.2023 and, on the selfsame date, this Court granted ad-interim relief in favour of the respondents. Due to the order passed by this Court, the applicant is finding it difficult to mutate his name in ZIP 1 of 2
49-IA-1495-2026 (c).doc the record of rights. The concerned authorities did not accede to his request despite execution of the registered Sale Deed.
4. The interim application is allowed in terms of prayer Clause ‘a’.
5. Upon furnishing the undertaking by the applicant to the Trial Court, it would be open for him to agitate his claim for mutation of his name, and the order passed by Court on 07.09.2023 shall not be an impediment thereto.
6. It is clarified that the Sale Deed executed in his favour shall be subject to the outcome of the suit.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] ZIP 2 of 2