Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13470 (RAJ)

JAIPAL PUNJABI S/O SHRI ARJUN DAS v. NATHMAL DIDEL

CCP/641/2023 · 2026-08-14

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:32507] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 641/2023 CNR: RJHC020432202023 | URN: CCP / 666U / 2023 Jaipal Punjabi S/o Shri Arjun Das, Aged About 63 Years, R/o B35, Prem Colony, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Nathmal Didel, M.d. Rsrtc Head Quater Pariahan Marg Choumu House Jaipur. 2. Ramgopal Pareek Finance Adviser, R.s.r.t.c Head Quater Parivahan Marg, Choumu House Jaipur. 3. Bhanwar Ali Chief Manager, R.s.r.t.c Cental Bus Stand Sindhi Camp Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 14/08/2026 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in compliance of the Court’s order, they are handing over a cheque bearing No.256600 dated 22.05.2026 amounting Rs.2,16,877/- to the petitioner who is present in Court. He further submits that now the order of the Court has been complied with by the respondents by handing over the aforesaid cheque amounting Rs.2,16,877/-. The petitioner who is present before this Court accepts the above referred cheque. Taking into consideration the fact that the respondents handed over the cheque to the petitioner for the dues as directed [2026:RJ-JP:32507] (2 of 2) [CCP-641/2023] by the Court, in opinion of this Court that the respondents have complied with the order of the Court. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed. If the petitioner still feels that some of the dues is still to be paid by the respondents, he may avail appropriate remedy available to him under law. Contempt notices stand discharged. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 120/Ashish Kumar