SAKIL S/O RAJJAR KHAN KALTARIYA v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
CW/6747/2026 · 2026-08-10
Anand Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13467 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13467 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:31312] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6747/2026 CNR: RJHC020274312026 | URN: CW / 14815U / 2026 Sakil S/o Rajjar Khan Kaltariya, Tehsil Pahari, Kaltariya Sehson, Bharatpur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. Reserve Bank Of India, Rambagh Circle, Jaipur-302004 Through Its Regional Director.
2. The Bank Manager, Axis Bank Nagar (Rj), Ganduri Mohalla, New Bypass Road, 321205, Nagar, Rajasthan Through Its Manager.
3. Deputy Inspector General, Cyber Crime, Police Head Quarters, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sabir Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Gupta for Bank Ms. Devakriti Vashishtha with Ms. Sunita Meena and Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 10/08/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with a prayer to direct the respondent-Bank to defreeze the account, maintained by the petitioner with Axis Bank.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that account of the petitioner has been freezed on the basis of information provided by the Investigating Authority. However, there is no complaint against the petitioner on National Cybercrime Reporting Portal.
[2026:RJ-JP:31312] (2 of 2) [CW-6747/2026]
3. The said statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-Bank is supported by the respondent-Department.
4. There is nothing on record to show that any complaint has been received by the Investigating Authority, nor copy of any FIR or cyber crime complaint is on record. Under these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for granting liberty to approach the Competent Authority in view of Clause 10 of Grievance Redressal Mechanism of Section-III of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 02.01.2026 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs.
5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to avail his remedy under the aforesaid SOP and the Authorities are
directed to dispose of the grievance of the petitioner within the timeframe given in the SOP.
6. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case.
8. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J 43/DIVYA