Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13464 (JHR)

IDRISH MIYAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHADN

A.B.A./2555/2026 · 2026-05-14

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:14897 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 2555 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2555 of 2026 Idrish Miyan, aged about 44 years, son of Kurban Miyan, resident of Village Dukhu Barmasia, Panchayat Ganpura, P.O. Phul Jhanjhri, P.S. Pakuriya, District- Pakur, Jharkhand … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Sumit Gautam, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. ----- 02/14.05.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakuriya P.S. Case No.19 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 303(2)/ 317(2) of the BNS, Rule 4/54 of JMMC Rules, Section 4/21 of MMDR Act, Rule 7/9 of the Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Pakur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He also submits that the petitioner is the owner of the seized tractor. He further submits that the allegations are made of loading 100 CFT stone chips on the tractor. He next submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 12 of this application. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of illegally carrying stone chips on the said tractor. ( 2026:JHHC:14897 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 2555 of 2026 5. Considering that the petitioner is the owner of the tractor and he has got no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 12 of this application and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Pakur in connection with Pakuriya P.S. Case No.19 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 14th May, 2026 Ajay/