IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32108 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2026 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Abhishek Kumar @ Golu, Son of Sri Ranjan Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Chhota Bihar Colony, Bhagalpur, P.S- Zero Mile, District- Bhagalpur 2. Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Chaudhary son of late Ram Sewak Chaudhary Resident of Village- Chhota Bihar Colony, Bhagalpur, P.S- Zero Mile, District- Bhagalpur 3. Ashish Kumar son of Dayanand Singh @ Devnandan Singh Resident of Village- Krishna Nagar, Giridih, PS- Panchambha, Dist- Giridih, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv. Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Adv. Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-05-2026 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 101 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 140(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that petitioner Abhishek Kumar @ Golu had advanced loan to the alleged abductee, Satyam Parasar @ Sonu, and due to dispute regarding repayment of the same, the present false case has been instituted. Learned counsel further submits that in his statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the alleged abductee admitted taking money from petitioner Abhishek Kumar and stated that Abhishek was demanding Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32108 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 repayment thereof. It is also submitted that when the police reached the rented premises at Bhagalpur, all persons including the alleged abductee were found together and nobody was in captivity, nor was any injury found on his body. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and have been languishing in jail since 26.03.2026. 4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of the petitioners. 5. In the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the statements made in the petition as well as above submissions, coupled with the facts that the so-called victim was recovered on the same day of occurrence and there was money transaction between the petitioners and the victim and also taking into account the petitioners’ fair and clean antecedent and their custody period, this Court is inclined to release them on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioners named-above be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 101 of 2026. annu/- (Shailendra Singh, J) U T