1 2026:CGHC:13838 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6318 of 2021 1 - Hemraj Patel S/o Late Peela Singh Patel Aged About 51 Years Working As Assistant Sub Inspector, And Posted At Office Of S.P. Kondagaon ( C.G.) 2 - Peer Mohammad S/o Late Guljar Mohammad Aged About 45 Years Working As Assistant Sub Inspector, And Posted At Police Station Khamtarai, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Ramvilas Negi S/o Shyam Sundar Negi Aged About 49 Years Working As Assistant Sub Inspector, And Posted At Police Station Bodhghat Jagdalpur, District - Bastar (C.G.) ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Police Head Quarters(PHQ) Sector-19, P.S. Rakhi, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Superintendent Of Police Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Superintendent Of Police Kanker, District - Kanker (C.G.) 5 - Superintendent Of Police Jagdalpur, District - Bastar (C.G.) 6 - Bhelaram Rajput Working As Sub Inspector, Posted At Police Station Benur, District - Narayanpur (C.G.) 7 - Maheshwar Lal Dewangan Working As Sub Inspector, Posted At Police Station Arang, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : None appeared even in two rounds For Respondents No. 1 to 5 : Mr. Anway Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 23/03/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.03.24 11:50:20 +0530 2 “10(i) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authorities to consider and grant promotion to the petitioners prior to date of promotion of respondents no. 6 and 7 as they are much their juniors with all consequential benefit, in the interest of justice. 10(ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the promotion orders (Annexure P-1) of the respondents no. 6 and 7 on the post of Sub Inspector and the petitioners may be considered for promotion on the post of Sub Inspector from the date of their juniors has been granted promotion, in the interest of justice. 10(iii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. It appears that the petitioners have challenged the order of promotion of respondents No. 6 and 7 from the post of Assistant Sub Inspector to the post of Sub Inspector dated 22.07.2021. 3. Mr. Anway Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondents No. 1 to 5/State would submit that the order of promotion passed in favour of respondents No. 6 and 7 has already been cancelled vide order dated 05.01.2022. 4. Heard learned Panel Lawyer for the State. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners have challenged the order of promotion passed in favour of respondents No. 6 and 7 and same has been cancelled by the respondent authorities vide order dated 05.01.2022, therefore, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti