Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13459 (KAR)

BHASKAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/9765/2023 · 2026-04-27

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24002 CRL.P No. 9765 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9765 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-) BETWEEN: 1. BHASKAR S/O SOMARAYA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/A GOPANAL VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE, HAROHALLI KARNATAKA - 577 213 2. PUNITH KUMAR S/O RIVAL JU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/A GOPANAL VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE KARNATAKA - 577 213 3. VINAY S/O RIVAL JU AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/A GOPANAL VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE, HAROHALLI KARNATAKA - 577 213 4. BALESH S/O BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A GOPANAL VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24002 CRL.P No. 9765 of 2023 DAVANAGERE, HAROHALLI KARNATAKA - 577 213 5. NANDA KUMARA S/O BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/A GOPANAL VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE, HAROHALLI KARNATAKA - 577 213 6. PAVANA KUMAR S/O BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/A GOPANAL VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE, HAROHALLI KARNATAKA - 577 213 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIRAJUDDIN AHMED., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SHO CHANNAGIRI P.S CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE REP BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE -01 KARNATAKA - 577 213 2. SMT. CHIMITHA W/O LATE M P SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/A GOPANAL VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE KARNATAKA - 577 213 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N.JAGADEESHA., ADDL. SPP FOR R1) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24002 CRL.P No. 9765 of 2023 THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.1197/2022 DATED 15.04.2022 ARISING OUT OF CRIME NO.27/2022 (ANNEXURE-C) FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 143, 147, 323, 324, 504, 354(B), 506, 149 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHANNAGIRI AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER NO.1 TO 6 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER This Court on 21.04.2026, had passed the following order: “Finally, time is granted upto 25.04.2026 to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition would be dismissed for its non-prosecution. In the event, office objections are complied with, list this matter on 27.04.2026, in the fresh matters list and if the office objections are not complied with, list this matter under the caption ‘dismissal for its non- prosecution.” - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24002 CRL.P No. 9765 of 2023 2. Learned counsel for petitioner has not complied with the office objections even today. 3. In that light, the petition is dismissed for its non- prosecution. I.A.No.1/2023 also stands disposed, as a consequence. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 209