(2026:JHHC:15132) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4127 of 2026 ------ Amandip Singh aged about 23 years, S/o Harjeet Singh Heera, R/o House No. 27, Sundu Road, 10 No. Basti, P.O. & P.S.- Golmuri, Town Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Kumar Trivedi, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 15-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kadma P.S. Case No.01 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 281, 125(b), 109(1), 132 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and under Sections 134(A), 184 and 187 of the M.V. Act, 1988. Learned counsel for the petitioner files supplementary affidavit. Keep the same on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the driver of the Swift Dezire car going at a high speed and tried to hit police officers including police constables and the said car came again after 05 minutes and intentionally hit constable Hiralal Mahto by which Hiralal Mahto fell down on the ground and sustained injury. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that by drawing attention of this Court to para-03 and para-04 of the supplementary affidavit submitted that even though the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report yet without putting the petitioner on T.I.P., charge-sheet has been submitted against him basing upon at video recovered from a Sim card of mobile phone which is not possible technically and none of the witnesses have been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the co-accused persons of this case have been admitted to bail vide order dated 23.04.2026 in B.A No.3381 of 2026. It is submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.0.2026 as has been mentioned in para-26 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamshedpur in connection with Kadma P.S. Case No.01 of 2026 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 15/05/2026 Amar/