Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13452 (GAU)

PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA v. SHYAM SUNDAR BAJAJ AND 2 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3002/2026 · 2026-09-01

Soumitra Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010180632026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3002/2026 PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA SON OF LATE KAVIRAJ JAGADISHWAR SHARMA, RESIDENT OF KEDAR ROAD, GUWAHATI- 781001 IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS SHYAM SUNDAR BAJAJ AND 2 ORS FLAT NO. 1B, 1ST FLOOR, JAGADISHWAR PALACE, M.S. ROAD, CHAWALPATTY, FANCY BAZAR, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781 001, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM AND ALSO THE RESIDENT OF THE ADDRESS- BAJAJ HARDWARE, BEHIND JAIN MANDIR, L.N.B. ROAD, NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN - 781335 2:RADHESHYAM BAJAJ BAJAJ HARDWARE BEHIND JAIN MANDIR L.N.B. ROAD NALBARI ASSAM PIN - 781335 3:SANJAY KUMAR BAJAJ RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. 1B JAGADISHWAR PALACE M.S. ROAD FANCY BAZAR GUWAHATI-0 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S T BOKTH, MR. A NARZARI Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : Arb.P./55/2026 PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA SON OF LATE KAVIRAJ JAGADISHWAR SHARMA RESIDENT OF KEDAR ROAD GUWAHATI- 781001 IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. VERSUS SHYAM SUNDAR BAJAJ AND 2 ORS. FLAT NO. 1B 1ST FLOOR JAGADISHWAR PALACE M.S. ROAD CHAWALPATTY FANCY BAZAR GUWAHATI PIN-781 001 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM AND ALSO THE RESIDENT OF THE ADDRESS- BAJAJ HARDWARE BEHIND JAIN MANDIR L.N.B. ROAD NALBARI ASSAM PIN - 781335. 2:RADHESHYAM BAJAJ BAJAJ HARDWARE BEHIND JAIN MANDIR L.N.B. ROAD NALBARI ASSAM PIN - 781335 3:SANJAY KUMAR BAJAJ RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. 1B JAGADISHWAR PALACE M.S. ROAD FANCY BAZAR GUWAHATI-01 ------------ Advocate for : MS. S T BOKTH Advocate for : appearing for SHYAM SUNDAR BAJAJ AND 2 ORS. Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 02.09.2026 Heard Ms. S.T Bokth, learned counsel for the applicant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in Arb. Pet No. 55/2026, the addresses of the opposite party No. 2 who is a proforma respondent is incorrect and therefore, the present interlocutory application has been filed seeking liberty to correct the address of proforma respondent/opposite party No. 2. Considering the submissions made, the interlocutory application stands allowed. The applicant is permitted to make necessary correction in the address of opposite party no. 2 in Arb Pet No. 55/2026. The applicant will file amended cause title within two weeks before the Registry and the arbitration Petition No. 55/2026 be listed thereafter. Interlocutory application accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant